The mandate of the ECAC | The Terms of Reference for the ECAC | District AIDS Councils | Multisectoral Approach
The Mandate of ECAC
The
mandate of ECAC is derived from the National Strategy Plan document.
Within the Province, ECAC is the highest body that advises government
on all matters relating to HIV and AIDS.
It has the following major functions:
- Advising the government on HIV and AIDS /STI policy;
- Advocating for the effective involvement of sectors and organizations in implementing programmes and strategies;
- Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the National and Provincial HIV/AIDS Plan in all sectors of society;
- Creating and strengthening partnerships for an expanded provincial response amongst all sectors;
- Mobilising resources for the implementation of the AIDS programmes; and
- Recommending appropriate research.
The Terms of Reference for the ECAC
In terms of this mandate, the Terms of Reference of ECAC are:
- To advise the provincial government on policy and HIV and AIDS related matters;
- To assist in the development of the annual Provincial HIV and AIDS Plan;
- To
mobilize organs of civil society behind a common Plan of Action
(Provincial HIV and AIDS Plan) through effective communication with all
relevant stakeholders;
- To mobilize political will and commitment behind the Provincial HIV and AIDS plan;
- To
promote functional integration between Government Departments and
across spheres of government with respect to holistic and comprehensive
approach to HIV and AIDS;
- To co-ordinate and focus the efforts of government and civil society organisations vis-à-vis HIV and AIDS interventions;
- To
monitor the implementation of the Provincial HIV and AIDSS Plan to
ensure policy compliance and performance monitoring of targets;
- To
develop capacity in the District and Local AIDS Councils to enable them
to fulfill their mandate in implementing the National and Provincial
HIV and AIDS Plan;
- To provide strategic and technical support with a view to strengthen local government and community responses to HIV and AIDS;
- To mobilize and leverage technical and financial resources in support provincial and local efforts to combat HIV and AIDS;
- To facilitate networks and partnerships in support of the Provincial HIV and AIDS Plan;
- To conduct HIV and AIDS related research; and
- To co-ordinate all HIV and AIDS related activities.
back to top
District AIDS Councils
Join the fight against HIV and AIDS - be part of a district AIDS Council:
| District |
Chairperson |
Address |
Contact Details |
Alfred Nzo District Municipality |
Cllr Goya |
Health Portfolio Councillor Alfred Nzo District Municipality Erf Ntsizwa Street, Private bag X511, Mt Ayliff |
T: 039 254 0511 F: 039 254 0514 mbeten@alfrednzodm.org.za |
Amatole District Municipality |
Cllr H Neale-May |
Health Portfolio Councillor Amatole District Municipality 40 Cambridge Street, P.O. Box 320, East London |
T: 043-701 4154 F: 043-722 8850 helenn@amatoledm.co.za |
Cacadu District Municipality |
Cllr Peters |
Health Portfolio Councillor Cacadu District Municipality P.O. Box 318, Port Elizabeth |
T: 041-508 7144 F: 041-508 7123 otto@cacadu.co.za |
Chris Hani District Municipality |
Cllr Dzedze |
Health Portfolio Councillor Chris Hani District Municipality 42 Cathcart Road, Private Bag X7121, Queenstown |
T: 045-808 4600 F: 045-839 3467 |
O R Tambo District Municipality |
Cllr N Mabandla |
Health Portfolio Councillor O R Tambo District Municipality Magwa House, Private Bag X6043, Umtata |
T: 047-501 6444 047-532 2329 F: 047-532 2158 047-532 4166/51 thuso_umt@intekom.co.za |
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality |
Cllr M Swarts |
Health Portfolio Councillor Nelson Mandela Metro Municipality Govan Mbeki Street, P.O. Box 136, Port Elizabeth |
T: 041-505 4419 F: 041-505 4497 akakancu@mandelametro.gov.za |
Ukhahlamba District Municipality |
Cllr Tyali |
Manager: Health & Social Services Ukhahlamba District Municipality Private Bag X102, Barkly East |
T: 045-979 2292 F: 045-979 2286 mabaso@ukhahlamba.co.za |
|
Multisectoral Approach in the other countries
HIV
and AIDS programmes that built strong networks have found that every
person, group, or interest that was involved from the genesis have
multiplied their impact. By contrast, those who started alone in the
fight against HIV and AIDS seem to remain alone, with only their
resources and support to throw against challenges that are continuously
growing in both size and complexity.
Every group has
something to contribute, from NGOs, political organisations, the
religious community, business, the communications industry, the medical
community, all levels of government, public and private service
agencies, law enforcement agencies, labour movements, educational
institutions, people from all races and sexual orientations, foreigners
etc.
Whether these groups have money, services, power,
influence, time, skills, knowledge, access to people within risk
groups, ability to facilitate programme operation within the larger
community, or a clout to change public or private organisational
policies about HIV and AIDS or resources needed by their programmes.
Multisectoral collaboration was needed with urgency. The best platform
of the multisectoral approach is at the AIDS Councils with all the
sectors from the society.
Leadership and Political Commitment at All Levels
When
HIV and AIDS came into the fore globally, effective leadership was
needed more than it was during apartheid and colonisation regimes.
While
bewildered by the rhythm and deadly pace of HIV and AIDS on one hand,
fresh ideas, strategic solutions and pro-active solutions that will
later develop into effective programs were needed on the other to
manage and control the spread of this epidemic.
There has been a consistent and high-level leadership in countries where the epidemic is being controlled at the national level.
In
countries like Uganda and Thailand, top leaders demonstrated clear and
sustained commitment to the fight against HIV and AIDS.
These
countries have had greatest successes in reducing the impact of HIV and
AIDS to the livelihood of their people as well as their economy.
Meanwhile countries of the leaders who have not shown similar
commitment to the fight against this epidemic continue to have
embarrassing records with high statistics ravaging their economy and
the lives of many people.
A common feature of the
successful countries is that they adopted a multisectoral response.
Ministries of Health had to relinquish ownership of the disease by
allowing other sectors to contribute in the fight as it affected
everybody irregardless of social, financial status or race. This is
seen in the location of AIDS Council leadership outside the health
sector – in the Prime Minister’s Office in Uganda and Thailand, in
office of the Deputy President in South Africa and in the Office of the
Premier in the Eastern Cape.
In countries where health has jealously guarded its interests, success has either been slower or non-existent.
AIDS Councils in Other Countries
Even
though SANAC was only formed in 2000, AIDS Councils in other parts of
the world have been operating with great success since the early 1980s.
A brief exploration of what people in other countries have done can
only help us to learn from their experiences and help us to avoid the
mistakes they made. At the same time it is a yardstick by which we
should measure what we do in the Eastern Cape.
Thailand
In
1991 the AIDS policy was placed under the co-ordination of the Office
of the Prime Minister Anand Panyarachun with a multi-sectoral National
AIDS Prevention and Control Committee chaired by the prime minister.
Philippines
In
1992 the Philippines established the multi-sectoral Philippine National
AIDS Council. This AIDS Council is required by legislation to include
26 members, including several Parliamentarians, representatives from
six NGOs and one PLWHA, two medical organisations, and the heads of the
following Departments or agencies: health; educations; employment;
social welfare; interior and local government; justice; economic
development; tourism; budget management; foreign affairs and
information.
Uganda
In 1990 a
task force on AIDS was charged with developing a multi-sectoral
response to AIDS control. Participants included all government
departments, local and international NGOs as well as the major
international agencies. The process had strong support from President
Museveni, and resulted in the establishment of the 24-member Uganda
AIDS Commission.
France
The French Inter-ministerial Committee was formed in 1994 to co-ordinate the national response to AIDS.
Britain
The
British Special AIDS Cabinet Committee was established in 1986 when
AIDS became the focus of a high-profile political campaign.
Malawi
The
Malawi Cabinet Sub-Committee on HIV and AIDS is chaired by the Vice
President. Similar committees also exist in India and Botswana.
Brief Case Studies on Multi-sectoral Advisory Bodies
The
Eastern Cape AIDS Council has task teams, or advisory bodies, on
different aspects of its HIV and AIDS prevention and management
programmes. The same thing has been done in other countries as you will
read hereunder.
Multi-sectoral advisory bodies with
professional and community representation, both general and specialist,
on different aspects of HIV and AIDS prevention and management, can
lend their expertise and skills in task team programmes.
For
example, the Malaysian AIDS Council, an umbrella organisation of 27
groups, has a legal and ethical committee which formulated the AIDS
Charter: Shared Rights, Shared Responsibilities in 1995. The Kyrgyzstan
Multi-sectoral Co-ordination Committee on HIV and AIDS/STDs Prevention
established a Technical Advisory Group on Policy and Legislation which
held consultations in 1996, leading to the revision of the National
AIDS Law by Parliament in March 1997.
Leadership and Political Commitment at All Levels
When
HIV and AIDS came into the fore globally, effective leadership was
needed more than it was during apartheid and colonisation regimes.
While
bewildered by the rhythm and deadly pace of HIV and AIDS on one hand,
fresh ideas, strategic solutions and pro-active solutions that will
later develop into effective programs were needed on the other to
manage and control the spread of this epidemic.
There has been a consistent and high-level leadership in countries where the epidemic is being controlled at the national level.
In
countries like Uganda and Thailand, top leaders demonstrated clear and
sustained commitment to the fight against HIV and AIDS.
These
countries have had greatest successes in reducing the impact of HIV and
AIDS to the livelihood of their people as well as their economy.
Meanwhile countries of the leaders who have not shown similar
commitment to the fight against this epidemic continue to have
embarrassing records with high statistics ravaging their economy and
the lives of many people.
A common feature of the
successful countries is that they adopted a multisectoral response.
Ministries of Health had to relinquish ownership of the disease by
allowing other sectors to contribute in the fight as it affected
everybody irregardless of social, financial status or race. This is
seen in the location of AIDS Council leadership outside the health
sector – in the Prime Minister’s Office in Uganda and Thailand, in
office of the Deputy President in South Africa and in the Office of the
Premier in the Eastern Cape.
In countries where health has jealously guarded its interests, success has either been slower or non-existent.
back to top